Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20170821114621/@comment-2020973-20170823235120

Killer kev wrote: Fusedtwilight wrote: Maybe Quinn only got grazed by the buillit, or it could just be lazy writing.

I always assumed blue eyes means you murdered an innocent but I guess it is also about intent. But can we really blame them for killing Hunters? They ruthlessly murdered their pack, they had every right to get some payback. Feel bad for them and Satomi. She was like Talia. I think intent has very little to do with it. Jackson had no intent on killing all those people. He had no say in the matter but his eyes are still blue. And while I don't blame Jiang and Tierney for wanting to kill the hunters responsible, they practically admitted to not knowing if the hunters they killed had actually killed anyone from their pack. True, but the Hunters they killed still had knowledge of the murders. Though they may not have killed anyone from their pack that does not mean the Hunters were innocent or were guilty by association. If they knew murders were happening but refused to do anything about it does that not make them guilty?

Thats what I liked about that scene where they confessed and when Scott was talking to Noah. It was a moral dillema.