Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4091815-20160221025102/@comment-5163932-20160223180219

You can't pick and choose,  if a vote is superior in numbers then that is the will of community not matter how close it came, I wonder though...if people would be saying the same thing if there were only two or three votes more on no. While some may not have been active, they may been watching here for a long time, like me. I have been going to this wiki since 2014, I stopped editing because its not really a user friendly wiki because I saw people getting alienated and I was busy with another. Some will disagree and that is fair enough, to each his own. It does not matter if there are million views because if there is only a few of them editing here, then there is something wrong. A wiki like this, about a popular show should have higher traffic.

Again I say impartial, so maybe what would be fair is candidates that are neither against or for Paul, no bias either way then.

Bias doesn't belong on a wiki, so there shouldn't be some anyway.

Regardless if Paul stated reasons, the original thread was to decide if two new admins should be voted in. So maybe there should be a voting thread, if you so adamanent that currently selected ones are good, then it shouldn't be a problem to do it officially.