Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4723271-20140716053249/@comment-19765459-20140716164958

That is a rather hypocritical argument, seeing as how you are criticizing what is in my mind! Yet the only thing you know about me is my handle!

There is a principle that if you do not want to be subject to public criticism, then don't be famous. Criticism is the price that ALL public figures face for their choice in careers. This includes, but is not limited to, actors, athletes, media personalities, politicians and, yes, producers and writers of television and movies.

If someone does not want themselves or their work to be subject to criticism then they should not make it public in the first place! Taking your argument seriously would be to say that it is wrong to criticize ANY work put before the public, whether it be a television program, a piece of legislation or the opinions expressed by a social commentator on the grounds that you were not part of the process of of creating the thing in question, but merely were an audience to it.

If I were "trolling", I would not be putting this much thought into articulating my statements and analyzing the show. If you consider this commentary to be "trolling" then basically you are arguing that "trolling" = "anything Paul.rea doesn't like to read". Which, as I said, would suggest an abuse of moderator privileges.