Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-26841005-20150812130923/@comment-13965604-20150813014302

It depends on what you want answered. The blue eyed thing, or the is Stiles guilty thing.

I think Stiles is right about the blue eyed issue. Is he right? We don't really know until someone tells us he is. Theo's eye change doesn't prove or disprove the theory until we know for a fact he's not enhanced by the doctors in some way. We don't know what drove Kincaid on to his path, so we can't know that he doesn't or never felt guilt over killing someone. Peter is a psychopath, not a sociopath, please keep it straight, there are differences and he leans closer to psychopathy that sociopathy in that he plans his crimes and they aren't random fits of violence. But Peter does care about people. We saw it most clearly with Cora, and even him avenging the Pack showed he cared about them. In fact, it's the only thing he seems to really care about. Pack. Family. He would've had to be very close to whoever turned his eyes blue, but it is possible. Perhaps he even blames himself and feels guilty about escaping the fire, and not being able to help the other people we saw in the basement with him.

I think Theo is right about Stiles not being guilty of murder. It was indeed self defense and it kind of disturbs me that Primerage disagrees with that. I'd hate to have you on a jury if you think a kid that was attacked from behind and ran into a building that he had no reason to think his attacker had access to, and then trying to claim a bookshelf to get away and pulling a lynch pin to try and knock him down while climbing is murder. That's a case of wouldn't even make it to trial if I ever saw it, had he confessed up front. I feel like Theo being innocent is debatable.