Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-24642928-20140305234722/@comment-24642928-20140306232734

Let's not go to extremes. No one is saying all the baddies should be killed. But can agree that there be an instance when he may need to. I'm all for not killing, but if five more innocents die while you're looking for a non-fatal way to stop a baddie does that serve the greater good? Can we at least agree that maybe Scott should have walked away rather than trying to stop the Darach from being killed (since an alive and free Darach will likely kill innocents in the future)? Can we all agree that it did not serve the greater good to try to prevent the Darach from being killed?