Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-4091815-20160201231712

HolyDrumstick wrote: Paul.rea wrote: I actually referenced that attempted coup in my first response to this thread. More evidence of Paul's distorted view of his position.

Unless he just doesn't understand the actual definition of "coup."

You realise you don't own this site, and that it is not yours to lord over, right? You're just a user with admin privileges. Just a user with a few extra responsibilities that you simply ignore.

Which is it? I'm too active or I'm ignoring my responsibilities?