Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-98.21.154.70-20140718150100

HolyDrumstickofLove wrote: You've really got to understand...this argument is divided into two main groups, really.

Group #1:  Those who love the show, and want to see it written better, so that it doesn't run itself aground. They are the ones wanted this weak Scott problem fixed. I call this group "fans."

Group #2:  Those who love the show, and let it blind them to the truth that the writing is starting to run the show into failure. These are the ones that deny Scott's weakness and claim it is just how it is supposed to be. I call this group "Fanboys."

Now to address the problem of people not wanting to admit Scott is weaker:

The show has already said that Scott is holding back his animal side, and this is why he is a weak alpha. The twins fought him and tried to get him to tap into his animal side. They tried to teach him. He refused. They said he was going to be weak because of this.

So, this isn't some problem a handful of people have made up. We aren't comparing Scott to other alphas unfairly. It is actually in the STORYLINE.

Now, this problem will probably be addressed at a later time...but the writers are running out of time, because they are already losing viewers.

So, fanboys, please stop defending Scott, when it is actually in the storyline that he is a tree-hugging pansy.

close the thread paul this answers everything this thread was made for. i forgot about that twin scene and when you add it up even though it sucks it does make sense