Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4772791-20160123002637/@comment-1757720-20160214191420

Utah Alpha wrote: You're wrong, but, hey.. To each their own. What I mean is the Doctor is a secondary source, until we have evidence - the Beast itself - then it is just words, and words are wind. The Doctor could say its a chinese man with bad acne, and it still wouldn't be correct. Science 101, an unproven theory is just a theory, it isn't true.

Or are you talking about Scott not being the beast?