Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4772791-20160227093034/@comment-13965604-20160227202558

Abomiwitz wrote: LadyX wrote:  I'm not particularly buying it. But if that's what they want to play, they damn well better make Mason the red herring and have Allison be the actual beast. We only have two episodes left, it would be too convoluted to explain that at this point without having Allison involved So let me get this straight...

You'd rather have them bring back Allison - a character who's death has been the drive behind some touching and powerful character moments in the past two seasons - than accept Mason as the beast? Her returning would make moments like the Senior Scribe scene in 501 redundant.

I understand you're a fan of Allison. Don't get me wrong I love me some Crystal Reed, but bringing her back as the Beast would be a poor writing decision. People need to move on, and bringing the actress back for a flashback role definitely didn't help.

I'm actually not a big fan of Allison, she was looking too old to convincingly play the characters age any more. Go look back at My comments when everyone was arguing over who was going to die if you don't believe me. I'm saying that if the game they want to play is "the beast/chimera are descendants of le bete" that's what I would want to see because it would be the fastest way to explain that in two episode and make any lick of sense to most viewers.

I have well moved on for her death, but she does loosely follow the Chekov's gun rule, with her mention on senior scribe episode, her dad returning in the second act (plus actually seeing "her" last episode)

And, I mean... What's more emotional than seeing Scott not only have to hold his first love as she dies, but to have her return as a monstrous creature? It would be brilliant tv.