Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-5237598-20160202124220

HolyDrumstick wrote: Biz2424 wrote: To the original Poster,

You keep on saying you do not want Paul out of power but are basically the sole person attacking him. Also, you sound like a child with your name calling and just repeating the same crap over and over.

I have been visiting this site for a very long time and just decided to make an account due to this post. Although there has been a few times that I personally thought Paul was being a bit unfair in the past, he has always been very consistent in the way he puts information as canon.

You seem to be upset that your belief that there are multiple options for what Lydia could be. Paul is not stating that there couldn't be inconsistencies in the writing or that later it could be elaborated on what she is. He is simply stating by what the shows says she she is not supernatural. To me, that seems perfectly acceptable, knowing the show and that later things could change.

I am not sure what you want accomplished out of this. This wiki is ran way better then most other wiki sites out there and updated very frequently. The message boards are not important and I appreciate the fact that Paul clarifies or deletes peoples posts when they may mislead casual viewers to what is actually truth and canon on the show.

I will not get into any back and forth nonsense but I will say that you should probably find more productive things to do with your life. If the worst thing that happened to you in the recent past has been Paul huring your feelings then count your blessings. Good day. That's cool, man.

As far as what I want to accomplish:

I'd like Paul to keep his position because he does do a great job in many ways.

I'd like the community to vote in an admin with equal power to check and balance him.

That's all, really.

Have a good day, man. :)

I agree with biz. What are you trying to accomplish? Would you at least have the decency to tell us what your previous username was?

You say you don't want to demote Paul but your implied message says differently. I've been on this wiki early on and you are not the first to start a little coup d'état.

Here's what I am seeing. An opinionated Man/Boy who isn't happen because the guy who runs the site and has been running it for 6 years in the most professional way possible does not agree with you. Since going up against him directly is risky Business, you want a second bureaucrat whos backs your views. When reading your Posts, it becomes very clear that you are not looking for a "more open minded" bureaucrat (im not saying that I think Paul is narrow minded) as you would like to put it, but simply someone who agrees with you and who will implement the things you find correct.

Furthermore, a second bureaucrat would strongly slow down the regular updates of the site, since this second bureaucrat would be there to basically block Paul...

So since this is an open discussion with a vote, I vote for things to remain the same. Paul should stay the sole bureaucrat of this wiki!