Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160203212624/@comment-27547895-20160204023722

Alphawerewolf5 wrote: HolyDrumstick wrote: Alphawerewolf5 wrote: HolyDrumstick wrote: He actually says: "This is a creature...." Werewolves are creatures. Yes, but he could have just as easily said werewolf. He didn't. You don't always have to use the word Werewolf. One could say creatures or supernatural creatures when talking about Werewolves.

For exemple, when talking about werewolves, you could say:

A Werewolf loses control during a full moon.

or

This creature loses control during a full moon. I understand what you're saying, but the interview is not enough to claim that the Beast, while werewolf, is purely werewolf. It just is not a clear statement. He didn't say "The Beast is a just werewolf."

He referred to it as a creature twice in one statement, while comparing it to other werewolves.

And all other signs point to something more.

As I said, I don't think that "something more" makes it any less of a werewolf... just...something more. I think it's a lot harder to deny that the something more is not possible, at this point.