Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-25170268-20150215131937/@comment-25222572-20150315133645

^"sighs"

Shadow, I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that Graham was not personally offended by your theory. GB was simply attempting to expand on Paul's (perfectly valid) points, and explain WHY exactly your phrasing was incorrect. It wasn't an attack, you simply didn't seem to understand what was being said, so this necessitated GB having to repeat themselves.

Which YOU seemed to find offensive.....for some reason. I'm not sure why. The frustrated "lobotomy" comment was only after multiple attempts to explain to you what was wrong with your original comment. And hardly seems to warrant statements like "You are not worth my time any longer".

That's the kind of comment that should be reserved for unwarranted attacks on you as a person (not justifiable critiques on your phrasing) or for trolling. I'd appreciate it if you simply admitted fault when you ARE at fault, or asked for an explanation about HOW you were at fault, if you were somewhat unclear on why you were being targeted. It would have saved quite a bit of time.