Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24.130.28.230-20150721180826/@comment-6383956-20160131194310

And speaking of precedent, Paul, citing Deaton as though he's always correct is obviously fallacious because Deaton has been wrong before. Remember in season 3A when he explained the surrogate sacrifices and then was blatantly incorrect about how long they would remain "dead" under the water? (You know, when Deaton was wrong about a druidic ritual despite being a druid himself?) There's more of a precedent for Deaton being wrong than there is for any of the writers changing the definition of a word.

And yet, here we are.