Board Thread:Legitimate Canon Questions/@comment-65.93.139.213-20150630121457/@comment-131.118.255.194-20150702192218

wow sounds like you make the rules mate.

Deaton never mentions true alpha in the conversation, nothing to show it is absolute:

Scott: Find anything

Deaton: Maybe, are you sure this guy was a werewolf? As fas as I can tell, these claws are actually talons. In fact they are the talons of a harpy eagle. One of the largest knownn birds of prey

Scott: How does a werewolf get talons

Deaton: Personally, I'm more interested in how these talons were somehow able to absorb your powers. The onlyone who should be able to do that is a beta of your own making.

At best, it can only be implied he was talking about a true alpha, when you draw implications, it is not canon. It is not canonly stated that only a beta of a true alpha can absord his power. The only two things canonly stated are 1. Jennifer says Peter wants to steal scott's powers, which peter agrees.

2. Peter says a werewolf cannot take a true alpha's power.

Contradicting. but this conversation could well mean, only a beta of an alpha can steal an alpha's power.

Could also mean only the beta of a true alpha can steal a true alpha's power. This means it is vague. you cant just pick one because it suits your purpose. Therefore making it not canon.

Pre-Fire - Yeah you are right.

Post -Fire - Everyone gone their seperate ways. Laura and Derek, we dont even know if they were in contact, they weren't even aware of cora being alive, and peter was in a coma with the doctors not even sure how he was alive. how is this a pack exactly. They all separated and pack was pretty much gone. It's like saying Aiden and Ethan were still in the pack with Deucelion. Deucalion left and the pack broke up simple as that, Most of the hale's died, Derek and Laura left. and yet you'll call them a pack, yet again because it suits your point.

Post - LAura. really. I really dont have the mental strength to repeat myself. I give reasons why you cannot just conclude he is in peter's pack, based on situations with Scott, and yet again, you just conclude without proof or reasons. SMH. Thats why i say, seems like you make this rules mate. Cheers