Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160220165807/@comment-27719755-20160221041101

You think that because you say you won't start the thread means you are innocent. Just because you are more educated, or rather have a better understanding on how to be what they call politically correct does not mean you are not on the same level as the people outright calling for Paul's demotion. You never actually said Paul should be gone, but you have put the idea out there as well as wording your statement that "you won't start the topic". Whether you admit it or not, your words were the reason why we had alpha killer calling for a revolution and had people(who voted YES and NO) making multiple accounts and using proxys. You are one hundred percent correct that you have never typed that Paul needs to be demoted. You have been politically correct about your wording, but your intent was clearly to cause dissention and I guarantee if another person starts a topic about removing Paul, you will vote yes to demote him.

You are a very smart writer and are rarely caught actually saying things that you clearly are implying. You sound a lot smarter then the teenagers calling for Paul to be removed, but stop feigning innocence and acting like you hold no ill will towards Paul and that your personal feelings are not the reason you can't let this go. The voting was extremely close and I respect that more voted yes then no. I even messaged you on your wall about a way to improve your cause, trying to be helpful. But you calling Paul out because of him putting 3 people who he believed worthy of helping with the discussions(where most of these conversations will take place) and lettings us vote for them seems to be a fair middle ground. It is a far better idea then letting people vote for random people who we have no idea if they can do the job or not. Paul posted why he thought the people he nominated should be picked and even gave alternatives if those people did not want to take the offer. It just seems you are mad because Paul nominated them rather then you. You will claim he is trying to put his "yes men" in position, when you are really mad that you can't put a "No to Paul" man in position. I harbor no personal ill will towards you, I just think you trully believe you are 100% in the right when for all the things you state and  call Paul out for his manipulation when you clearly do the exact same.