Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20140910035928/@comment-6383956-20140921232456

Your own quote of your post still implied she hadn't been in the thread at all until after our discussion started. Which is categorically false. Silly me for thinking ONE quote of you erroneously implying that would do the trick. I should have made an entire encyclopedia of quotes where you implied our discussion started before she posted anything.

Here's the thing though, Paul. You called me a liar. I explained what I was thinking and what I knew or thought I knew at the time. But that's not good enough for you to admit that maybe, just maybe, you weren't 100% correct when you called me a liar. That's not good enough for you to apologize even though I've made it abundantly clear that pissed me off. The correct response here might be something like "I see now it was something of a miscommunication. Sorry." I'd still be pissed at you, don't get me wrong, but you wouldn't be such a complete asshole. (At this juncture, now that I've had to explain how apologies work, it's too late for you to offer one. Don't bother.)

And this, Paul, is only proving my point that you need to take a good hard look at yourself. You're a running a community. This kind of utter disregard for people is not a leadership quality. Complete assurance that you are infallible is only a leadership quality if you are the Pope -- which I don't believe you are. Get offline for an hour and go see a therapist, alright?