Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-4723271-20140720173219

67.140.199.59 wrote:

Paul.rea wrote: Simple question - how are you measuring alpha weakness?

You can't because you have nothing observable by which to judge.

If you can't define alpha weakness - then using a word that not in the dialogue to justify your belief won't work.

You can say he's not as strong as he should be - that's fair.

You can say he's not living up to his potential - that's fair.

You can say he's holding back - that's fair.

"Weak" places him at the bottom end of a scale - Weak to Strong - without defining the scale.

That's like giving him a "1" on a scale of 1-10 when you have no idea what constitutes a 1 or a 10.

If we had some valid comparison then we could detail the spectrum - as it stands we don't so you can't place Scott anywhere within the weak to strong continuum with any certainty. I think that bit about "what was said on the show" has been covered.

It's been covered over and over, he even admits its canon but still somehow thinks that scott is an average alpha