Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-27547895-20160212190721

Biz2424 wrote:

Regardless, Holy, I feel sorry for you and your cause. Even though we do not see eye to eye, I would say that for the most part, you are trying not to ruffle too many feathers. It is an absolute shame that some of the people who have joined your cause act the way they are, either trying to change the things you want into getting rid of Paul and starting a "revolution" or by resorting to name calling and attacking people personally. I know you have no control over how others act, but I wish they could see that their actions and words that they type could very much jeopordize your cause. I truly appreciate that you see that, even if we don't agree on the issue entirely.

As you say, I've unfortunately been painted as a villain, and that is largely due to people supporting my measures who resort to personal attacks. It comes with the territory. There are also those on Paul's side who weaken his position, but I am not going to name names. It is what it is.

I do wish, regardless of whether people agree or disagree, they'd actually take the time to see the truth in things, as you have.

I feel like there's way too much bad blood. I don't even feel like Paul is justified in feelings of animosity for me. Regardless of my position on this, I've reached out, a number of times, in efforts for peace. I encouraged him to vote. I praised his work. I revised my efforts so that we keep the inactive admin, as a compromise. Yet, he's never shown me courtesy.

I don't hate Paul, unlike many believe. I simply see a problem, and I'm attempting to fix it. However, this is a polarizing issue. It's much easier to just hate me and disregard what I am saying, or to hate Paul and disregard what he's saying, than it is to actually read and understand what is going on, and addess the issue honestly.

In any case, thanks for understanding, even while you disagree. That's enough for me.