User blog comment:Paul.rea/Teen Wolf News 082917/@comment-24.165.59.92-20170904170109

You should hope MGM Mirage doesn't read your article. The Mirage was dismissed from the case "with prejudice," meaning no charges can be re-filed against them. That is a strong indication the judge felt Cody's charges against The Mirage either didn't happen or there wasn't any proof. Saying in your article the judge, "let the Mirage off the hook" is not objective reporting, and very unprofessional. I also note your article does not mention you seeking any information from The Mirage or 1 Oak to offer any rebuttal to Cody's very serous allegations. This is one-sided "reporting," and very poorly done.