Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-11533671-20160211070041

Based upon the criteria established by those seeking a new admin then how would there not be conflicts? The sole purpose of the new admin is suggested to be the voice of dissent.

Forgoing emotional reasons, is there any information on this wiki that is completely untrue?

Look at the French translation dispute. It isn't worded as others want it to be but it includes a notation of explanation so the overall information that we take away from it is accurate. That is a crucial component of any encyclopedic information, accuracy.

Imho, I respect all sides of this debate but at the end of the day it really comes down to whether or not the wiki has accurate information or not. Isn't that the goal?