Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-25230571-20150731101948/@comment-4295751-20150819174047

LadyX wrote: You can't state it in a way that sounds like fact. Here. Use this phrase "I think he might be ______ because he did _____ that (insert creature name here) does." That should be fine. I'm aware. But it seems the theory is "too convoluted for what's essentially a secondary character", and it has more potential to confuse casual users than the theories about creatures that do not exist in the show..

The content of the post was: "I think Parrish might be (.....), because I find it curious that (.....), almost as if (.....)."