Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24744701-20160311092230/@comment-11533671-20160312192439

I swear the reasoning some folks have is unfathomable.

There is way too much headcanon here to even approach a sensible argument.

Examples: Deucalion being "100x stronger than..."or he was "100% fine", when those statements are nothing more than a subjective opinion based on nothing more than inflated and overblown expectations. Most of the time I see these things posted and it makes me wonder what show they've been watching?

The best indicator that all this is headcanon is when we're told how the writers would've written a character's actions as if they had some proprietary information or interest. That is absurd.

Show me ONE single piece of evidence that proves these statements. You can't. All the canon we have and there is not one single time that we're told exactly how strong someone is or to what degree that individual can take punishment.

We're shown displays of power and told how Deucalion earned it but that is all. Placing a number on the strength is simply speculation, nothing more and certainly not factual.

Here's what we DO know:

Deucalion was knocked down from the electricity and was later shot. By all accounts including his own strained voice when he says it isn't his day are clear indicators that he is hurt and NOT in any shape to whoop anyone's butt.

Oh but NO, "Deucalion is a hundred times stronger than anyone and blah, blah, *ignoring all signs to fit my headcanon *, blah. "

Stop pushing headcanon as fact.