Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4467206-20140611020917/@comment-6383956-20140707153609

1)

2) Shockingly enough, actors in a television show portray body language. You can learn things about situation by LOOKING and not just LISTENING. Look at the actor's FACIAL EXPRESSION. He is clearly in pain.

3) I never said "concrete proof", I said a less-than-subtle HINT. Look that word up -- LadyX posted a nice definition so you don't even have to look far. In the future though, you're on the Internet, if I'm using words you don't understand you can Google them. The fact is there was NOT ANY REASON WHATSOEVER for the writers to include that dialogue if it was not at least intended to make us speculate that he might be supernatural. NONE. It would not have made it into the episode if it was as insignificant as you seem to think. Aside from that, if you actually watch the scene, he it's pretty clear he wasn't drawn because of either the unsolved cases or the need for officers. Look at the actual dialogue from the show:

PARRISH: "Maybe I needed a chang. I don't really know. I kind of felt drawn here. And I knew there were openings."

The only reason the openings were even mentioned was an explanation of how he knew he could come to Beacon Hills. It is not the reason he came.

Yeah, Parrish was bewildered by the oni. SO WERE EVERYONE ELSE. You can be a supernatural creature and not know everything about the supernatural. (Unless, apparently, you're Peter Hale.)