Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160209013701/@comment-27547895-20160209054621

Sean 175 wrote:

HolyDrumstick wrote:

Sean 175 wrote: All the alphas who have fought(aside from Scott) have only fought against betas who they out rank in fighting experience(& power). Comparing Scott to the other alphas might be impossible. As Scott,as an alpha, has fought werewolves(& other supernatural creatures) who seem to have more experience at fighting & being a werewolf. Ex:

Peter vs Derek

Derek vs Scott

Deucalion vs Derek

Ennis vs Boyd(& Cora) 😎 While I appreciate your posts....the smiley face, man....the FN smiley face.... bugs me every time.

Seriously, though....just looking for a good base to go off of.

And there's a negligible difference in experience with Peter and Derek. I mean, they were teens (albeit of different ages) together.

Normal people of similar ages have very little difference, so it only makes sense that the same would be true of two 20-something werewolves. Well I guess it's true what they say. You really can't please everyone.

That's what I'm trying to tell you. You really can't draw a good base.

i wouldn't say negligible. As Peter has shown to be far more experience & wiser than Derek on multiple occasions. Peter himself said at one point in season 2 that he could still teach Derek some things. 🤔(How's this) Was kind of joking about the smiley. hehe

Peter's also an arrogant jerk (such a lovable one, though). He's going to say stuff like that.

As far as showing he is wiser....meh. I mean, Derek evolved as a werewolf, and Peter didn't.

I WOULD say negligible. Sure Peter is going to think he's better. That's just Peter. And sure, Derek is going to second guess himself next to Peter. That's just Derek.

I think when it comes down to a beta vs beta or alpha vs alpha brawl between the two, they'd be pretty even. I think Peter would win, but I think that's more due to ruthlessness than experience.

But, everyone's got their own opinions, ya know.