Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-24548301-20140225035043/@comment-6383956-20140825014717

Paul, the thing is -- firstly, you phrase it as an argument. Secondly, if someone clicks the link on their Google search in order to actually read the information it still says at the top of the page "FALSE INFO and Speculation" (like, you've done a Google search, right? Nobody's just going to take that little blip of info and run with it). So chill out.

Jester -- this is my point. "Canonically it does not exist" implies there is canonical evidence it does not exist. It implies it will not exist in the future. If we're nitpicking SO MUCH to SO ACCURATE on these forums, that's incorrect. It will give a wrong impression to the people stumbling in from Google that Paul is so worried about misleading. Ergo, the actual correct, not in any way misleading word on this is "we do not know one way or another." That's accurate.

By the way, Paul, still waiting on an answer regarding when they elaborated on banshees other than calling them supernaturals (which doesn't differentiate them from shapeshifters at all.) Any day now when you feel like answering that one.