Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-544940-20160309130458/@comment-27411820-20160323205809

Wolf Josh wrote: You can't blame Scott for how he is written. If you remember correctly, Jeff always compared him to Spider-Man/Peter Parker. Strong in some moments, weak in others. I get that, I think we all get that. You have to establish the villain and make them strong, it's understood, many shows do it. I can see him losing to the main villain a couple times and in the finale finally beating them....but in between, you should build him up, whether it is against flunkies or other means. In 5B, they did do that with him tearing apart the Chimera pack easily. Him losing to the Beast IMO, was fine, as long as he showed a good fight and put up a better fight then the others who went up against the Beast. They did build it up to be unstoppable, and being able to lose not because of a physical issue but outsmarting it.

My issue is the way he is written, and I like Teen Wolf, I think it has a lot of potential and still growth even if Scott goes off to college. I think the casual and smart fan realizes that the new villain has to be established and there is no better way to establish themselves then to beat the Alpha in town. Make him lose, but still evolve from that. Make him get closer to and closer or put a better showing before finally beating them. I am fine with Scott not killing anyone, that's what makes him unique and I respect that. However, not killing someone does not mean he has to be weak. He can still be strong. If they don't listen to reason, he could do what he did to Peter -- use enough force to knock them out and throw them to Eichen or let Argent handle the rest. That's my two cents. I love you.