Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24439517-20150809092415/@comment-13965604-20150812193929

T Angelus Ballack wrote: NervousShipper wrote: He called you obtuse, you called him childish. Doesn't that balance itself out? Balances itself out huh............I guess that's a weird way to look at it, I merely said his resorting to using insults was childish.

He has continually changed the argument, and i've indulged him, but every new argument is always like the rest, speculation on what could be and calling it Science.

Whether it was the funny idea that the law of physics is not broken on teen wolf, and later that it is only pushed, to the point of insinuating that gravity could be controlled by EM (giving an article that was EXPERIMENTING on something else), and giving a toy and giving a fallacy that because said toy was floating, EM could control gravity. All of the different arguments have been out there.

I'm merely stating all this not to get back into the argument, because I'm done, but to point out how all of the initial arguments made have been "funny". Maybe causing him to result to insult in th end

Paul's argument never changed. He stated, and continued to state that this is all in the bounds of theoretical science. Could he have said 'gives the appearance of controlling gravity" maybe. But the base of it is the same. Jeff has said they are human, everything this season has said they are human, not supernatural, and mastered sciences we are just brushing on.

Hell, we got into an argument a year or so ago about whether the werewolves were supernatural or science based.