Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-16913753-20130831054918/@comment-15314533-20130903012322

Destroyer Of Nations wrote: Darkfairytales623 wrote: I definitely think Deucalion has killed many innocent lives. That is why I am not so enamored with a redemption arc for him. But that is just my opinion. I really struggle with the whole innocent victim thing. What constitutes an innocent?

For example, a man who scammed hundreds of people out of their savings. Is he an innocent because he never killed anyone. How about a rapist? I understand what you mean...the terminology of innocent leaves a lot to be desired. The main definition of innocent is one who is not guilty so that leaves one giant loophole.

I personally believe that all 12 sacrifices were innocent in that they did not deserve to die, they had not done anything to warrant being killed and the 3 parents would have been innocent as well.

I know many made a lot of comments that warriors were not innocent in that they had killed by virtue of being in a war, but I think personally the definition needs to be broaden in the case of the sacrifices...

This is a topic that has been and could be debated for all time in my opinion.