Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-26011812-20150130115942/@comment-11533671-20150225024856

I tend to favor Peter more often than not and while I agree with his assessment of Scott not deserving to be the "Beacon Hills Alpha" due to his inability or unwillingness to soil his hands when needed, Scott is the more capable leader insofar as the show has revealed. People, for whatever reason, flock to him and look to him for support.

The debate could rage on and on but here are the bottom lines: Peter is too much of a narcissist to lead and focuses only on personal power. Scott tries to support and help everyone, always searching for the most peaceful solution...kind of like what we've heard about and seen from Talia. Overall, Peter losing (even planning to take out Scott, imo) was pretty lame but Scott is by no means weak. I'm sure we'll see his bad-assery coming soon.