Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-25521727-20140720024833

HolyDrumstickofLove wrote:

Paul.rea wrote:

No one on this thread is arguing that Scott is living up to his potential.

Not one person has made that assertion.

We are saying we don't have a good example of a "strong" Alpha that we can compare Scott to meaning we can't say he's weak based on observation.

We can say he's not living up to his potential based on the expectations expressed by characters in the script - but that doesn't translate to "weak."

When we see a "strong" Alpha on the show then we can discuss Scott's weakness relative to the strong Alpha. Until then - to say Scott is weak is unfair considering there have been no stronger Alphas within the known universe. No. It is completely fair to say that Scott is weak. It has been established in the show. You just keep denying it. You have good debate skills, but, unfortunately, the facts are not on your side. All you're saying is "Scott is weak, it's a fact".

Bring up SOME EVIDENCE other then the Kincaid shit.

That's actually all you've got.