Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24744701-20160311092230/@comment-13895380-20160314020209

Jestermonkey4u wrote: 1) simply in awe of your ability to cling to such ridiculous attempts to twist things to fit your narrative.

2) The entire discussion began due to us questioning why Deucalion seemed so hurt when he was shot. I've given possible reasons based on what we know. It doesn't make my thoughts canon and I've never claimed that it did.

3) My Lego analogy was simple and you took it way off base. I used it simply to show that someone could be hurt but not show any sign of it. That's all there was to it.

4) Finally, it is painfully obvious that you don't understand the point I and others are making but at the end of the day we all agree that the reason Deucalion stayed down is simply not known and if any answer is given in the show then we won't get it til next season. 1) K whatevs.

2) Dude, the argument began when you were saying that we were spewing headcanon by speculating Deuc got nerfed cause he's a good guy. It can't be headcanon, as it's about the writer's style (Teen Wolf and other shows does this often) not canon.

I even said from the beginning that there was no canonical proof to this, and I was just pointing out the mere irony of it, especially because Jeff usually does this:

"   And yes, there is no proof for that (besides Jeff's ideology that heroes should lose until the end) but it's just ironic that it happens right when we find out he's a good guy. lool It was just a funny moment, not that big a deal"

...yet you continued to talk about us saying that being a good guy makes you get nerfed is canon? What? We never said that was canon. Where'd that come from?

3) Dude, you used that Lego analogy to explain how Deuc could still be affected by the electrocution or gunk even though he seemed recovered in the scene when him, Scott, and Liam confronted Theo. I have explained clearly how it makes no sense to assume that he was still affected by the electrocution and gunk as all the on-screen evidence sugests otherwise, just like how there's no reason for someone to assume and be concerned that you haven't recovered yet from stepping on a Lego, even though it happened 30 minutes ago and you look perfectly fine.

4) Agreed, since the beginning.