Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-10493803-20140312173938/@comment-13965604-20140314151742

Grahamburglar wrote: LadyX wrote:

Grahamburglar wrote:

NotYourAverageWerewolf wrote: Sorry for not replying sooner but i guess Bennett has a good point on the "losing a pack member is like losing a limb" but i also like LadyX's theory of Scott feeling guilty about the twins. Although Allison makes more sense to me now, in the past episode Scott says that they are done, that they arent together anymore confirming that he has completely moved on. Plus Crystal is kinda not pulling the teenage look anymore. Additionally it would give Chris an intersting arc. The thing is, while it would give Chris an interesting arc, he's really only tied to the core group via Allison. If they get rid of her, I'm pretty sure Chris is gone too. Seems like they've been trying to tie him to the group via Derek recently. Just sayin'... There's a difference between tying someone to the group through a character and having them work together. Chris is Allison's father -- as far as we know, they came back to Beacon Hills from France because of Allison. The only reason Chris is really still involved in the supernatural happenings of Beacon Hills is because of Allison. The only thing that stops Chris from killing Derek or visa versa is Allison.

I just don't see his character staying relevant if we lose her.

Depending on how she dies, if she does, such as if the other hunter family kills her, accidentally or otherwise, I can see a good revenge arc/help the Beacon Hills supe community in honor of her memory, because it's what she would've wanted him to do. It would keep him around reasonably, at least for one season. And do we really know that they'll get more than one more season? No, we don't. Jeff may be saying that a fifth is almost guaranteed, but nothing ever is. That's just optimism at this point.