Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4467206-20140611020917/@comment-26193787-20140708030821

Grahamburglar wrote: Jestermonkey4u wrote: 3) Being a juvenile prick and insulting ppl's intellect by patronizing is immature and doesn't win any debate. In fact, it exposes your lack of emotional security since usually the first ones to "name-call" have fragile egos. You also show your intolerable view of those that disagree, and is even funnier, when the topic is one in which every side is inherently false UNTIL the real answer is canonically provided. In layman's terms: The debate cannot be settled no matter which side you believe until we see it on the show. I'm sorry -- who started the patronizing here? Your very first reply to me in this thread was patronizing, all of a sudden tone bothers you?

All I've done is point out the implication of a piece of dialogue, you have -- until a couple posts ago -- acted as though it was utterly unrealistic. I have never claimed it was anything more than a hint -- and as LadyX said it could just have been a red herring to make us suspicious (a point I've never argued against, btw -- I've only argued against your idea which seems to be that that bit of dialogue was totally random and pointless.)

You're right, this debate can't be settled but it wouldn't even be a debate if you would ever, in any debate on this site, be willing to concede anyone else's points. Which I don't think I've seen you do in any thread on this entire web site -- so who is intolerant now? still you