Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-72.192.213.236-20130730014327

What if...LONG shot here...none of those events actually happened to Derek? The ones from "Visionary."

Stay with me, now. This is a 1/1,000,000 shot, BUT Peter completely lied in that story, obviously, about many a thing. What if he even lied about who the events occured to?

What if they occured to Peter? I mean, Derek already has many a reason to be a sour wolf, namely his family mostly all dying...just saying. Also, something about the way Peter talked about the events were like he was holding something back more-so than just the lies we already saw in his explanation of events. There had to be more to it, right?

I know, I know, this is probably just the optimistic "let there be a reason for Peter's strangeness and oft-nihilism" part of me talking, but...what if?

Chances are nearly obsolete, but nothing ever makes sense in this show at first as it is. I mean, my only other reasoning for Peter lying (a MUCH more reasonable train of thought) is that he feels guilt for what he did leading Ennis to Paige. Or, maybe, he killed Paige and Derek didn't see him. But then that would ruin my Deucalion-killed-Ennis-to-prevent-him-from-remembering-the-events-of-the-night-when-Ennis-attacked-Derek-and-killed-his-one-true-love theory.

Oh, well. This is probably all very false, but I thought I'd put it on record in case by some awry circumstance I turn out to somehow have caught onto something. I just think that there has to be a reason for Peter's strange and erratic, sometimes sociopathic, behavior all show long. Maybe he didn't know this because he was Derek's greatest confidante. Maybe he knew this because it happened to himself.

Thoughts?  