Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-50.9.110.69-20140807061727/@comment-99.170.226.119-20140808064457

124.186.220.224 wrote: 99.170.226.119 wrote:

50.9.110.69 wrote: Just think about it the mute tried to kill peter then told him derek was next but we all now know peter is not on the dead pool so why would the mute even go after him and how would peter with a tomhawk is his chest laced with wolfsbane just so happen to get the mutes' communicator. I think this was a set up to prove peters' innocence but when derek and sheriff caught the mute peter just so happen to turn up at the store and kill him ? think peter was making sure to cover his tracks here I think Peter was really just at the wrong place at the wrong time & killed the mute for "an eye for an eye" thing.

Name: Sean Never bought that, personally. At the time, none of them had any information about the Deadpool, the assassins, any of it. The Mute was worth interrogating, at the very least. And Peter has never been the type to throw away a useful tool. So, would he really do that for no reason other than,"You hurt me. I'll hurt you worse."? Especially considering he is now in alliance with freaking KATE. Dude, the guy threw a laced wolfsbane tomahawk at peter's chess & tried to kill him. Also, peter working with Kate is just him swallowing his pride so that he could get what he wants. He'll probably just kill her after he gets what he wants. Plus I really wasn't trying to say that the theory was wrong. I just didn't fully agree.