Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-20061173-20150619211535/@comment-26601629-20150723162544

NervousShipper wrote: Yes, it's called the Tumblr perspective, T. (Although not always wrong. In this case, I'm sure it wasn't the writer's intention. I can see where LadyX is coming from though) Most of it is based on perspective, but some of it is just outright wrong, when I say wrong, I don't mean the words themselves. The meaning from a statement is derived not just from the words, but the premise, expression, and intention of the person making the statement. Saying that correcting her on her favourite food is condescending her is just extreme, and wrong.

I dont want to have to go through LadyX entire points but I might have to, so as to better explain my point. Her analysis of the situation just reminds me of how the military sort of handled the arch-angel in Gundam Seed.

First malia punched stiles in first real meeting, there was nothing wrong with that. It's like she says, was she supposed to thank him. He had basically played a role in ending the life she knew, and she was committed into an institution.

I dont think the poster gets to decide whether or not it is right for them to have sex.

Third point would be disturbing(if it actually happened) now I don't remember this, maybe LadyX could be kind enough to point out the episode where it says she breaks into his room every night to claw him up. Stiles complaining about being the little spoon i remember(lol even though it was the only position he could sleep comfortably in).

Stiles lies to her, thats just reaching. Doesn't this basically happen in almost all relationships, at least TV ones, didn't scott essentially keep his being a werewolf from allison, isn't scott lying to Kira about he aura for her own good, isn't parrish currenly lying to lydia about his dream,  i could go on and on.

Saying he degrades her by saying thats an improvement, I mean really. How is that degrading, especially given the premise it happened. A failing student after reading is called on inclass to answer a question, he/she is able answer part of the question, and the professor says that's an improvement. is that degrading? Even his tone wasn't condescending.

But like I said earlier, and in my first response, from a perspective point of view, most of her points are not wrong, but when considering the people in this case, the premise, the tone, the expressions, and the reasons, then it comes off as really really off.