Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160203212624/@comment-27547895-20160204021714

Alphawerewolf5 wrote: He refers to it as a werewolf that doesn't have any of the typical werewolf eye colors, which makes it seem like a different creature than the other werewolves. Note the make it seem. He actually says: "This is a creature...."

I'm not saying that we can say that it definitely is not pure werewolf based on what he is saying, but I am saying that we also cannot say it is entirely werewolf based on what he says there.

We can't, sorry. We just don't know.

And, the fact that chimeras were used and the Beast looks like no other werewolf ever seen suggest that it is likely that the Beast is something more.

Can we call anything canon? No, definitely not. But, we can very reasonably theorize that the original Beast was not purely werewolf. That's all I'm saying.