Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-4723271-20140719055816

Jackson Van Kleeck wrote: Killer kev wrote: Kincaid was an omega taken down by two other omegas so it shouldnt have been a problem for an alpha to take down an omega. Scott was an omega in season 2 and he took down an omega and now he's an alpha getting his ass kicked by omegas. You dont see a problem with that. Scott is not an average alpha no matter what you or paul think We don't know how much stronger an alpha "should" be then a beta or an omega for that matter, I don't think you get that, there are exceptions.

We also don't know if Kincaid is an omega or not, saying he is an omega is completely speculative as he could be a member of some unknown pack. So, yeah, labeling Kincaid as an omega represents lack of canon usage.

Kincaid appears to be a better fighter then the omega in Season 2, just because he is bigger and defeated Scott.

Again, your statements are 100% specualtive and just simple guesses, therefore they are considered wrong. Look at my statements above.

We dont know exactly how much stronger but we know their  stronger, like when Alpha peter kicked both scott and Derek's ass at the same time or when Alpha Derek beat the hell out of scott at the ice rink without even trying that simply proves that alphas are much stronger than betas and omegas.

Your right we dont know if Kincaid is a omega but lets say he's beta then that means he lost to two omegas and as I just proved one alpha can beat two omegas and that's canon, we all saw it.

Just because he 's bigger and beat scott doesnt make him a better fighter than the omega from season 2, scott isnt nearly as good of a fighter now as he was in season two and thats because he isnt going full throttle because he doesnt want to a monster like peter.

all of that is 100% canon