Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20160411234226/@comment-5237598-20160512095244

Please stop, the both of you. You are arguing over stuff we don't know. We have actually no idea what would happen if Scott killed someone. Before he became a true Alpha, Deaton said that in order to become a true Alpha, Scott must not kill. Does that mean that he still can't kill as an Alpha? Idk. Although in S3, when Scott defeated Jennifer, he said that he would kill her if she ever tried to pull a stund like that again, regardless to what it would do to his eyes. Since he just became an Alpha, this would suggest that the no killing rule still applies. But then again it's teen wolf, where instored rules Change when the writers feel the need.

The example of Scott killing Hayden or Liam was given... Assuming that the no killing rule is still valid, you forgot about something else. An Alpha who kills his own Beta grows stronger and absorbs some his powers. All the Alphas in the Alpha pack killed their Betas... So technically they don't have a pack... They shouldn't be Alphas anymore... Now how can you determine which rule trumps which? Who's to say that Scott won't stay an Alpha and actually grow stronger if he chooses to kill Liam and/or Hayden? What I am trying to say is that both you guys made some valid Points. Both your arguments have an internal logic consistancy, but some assumptions have been made along the way. Meaning that nobody's right, because we simply don't know.

As for Scott being weak (or not). Here's my Point of view: Scott is way to weak. I agree that he had a few badass moments (removing the burning wire from his throat was one of them), but all in all, he got beat up way more often than not. To me it's annoying. Scott the Boyscout never wanting to hurt anybody, fighting with "one Hand behind his back" because he doesn't want to kill. He always wins the "end-fight" because of some stupid ruse or some stupid last Minute solution that came out of nowhere.