Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-25184427-20140720001006

1.)  I don't have to measure alpha weakness.  The show (Kincaide and the twins) has already done that for me.

2.)

"If you can't define alpha weakness - then using a word that not in the dialogue to justify your belief won't work."

I don't have to... Again, the show has done this for me.

3.)

"That's like giving him a "1" on a scale of 1-10 when you have no idea what constitutes a 1."

No...not a all. It is like saying he is below the 50 percentile.... The average was set by the show. I am not incorrect in saying that he is below it. How far? No one will likely ever know.

4.)  "If we had some valid comparison then we could detail the spectrum - as it stands we don't so you can't place Scott anywhere within the weak to strong continuum with any certainty."

Again, not at all. The show has set the standard, not I. I can easily place Scott on the weaker end of the spectrum by what the show alone has told and shown us.