Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20170821114621/@comment-2020973-20170824040627

Killer kev wrote: And this is the point where the discussion becomes tricky. They've failed to elaborate on what defines a person as innocent, by supernatural standards. It could be as simple as whether or not they've killed someone, but no one knows for sure. So having knowledge of the hunting (or any crime in general) may not be enough to strip someone of their innocence. True, the Hunters they killed may have been led to assume the shifters they hunted would not be harmed. Merely contained or driven out of the town. But I am glad they didn't explain further. They didn't have time to go exploring the Hunters histories and it makes the viewers wonder if they really were justified in their actions.

Personally the way I see if even if the Hunters they killed never killed anyone they still deserved to die if they knew murders were taking place and did nothing to stop it. Just because they are not activly participating doesn't mean they are not helping hunting and pointing the others in the right direction.