Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-6383956-20160208164058

I'm curious -- can someone explain to me the actual downside of having an admin who's picked by the community?

Like, so many people seem to be totally against this. But, like, we're not looking for anarchy. We're looking for an admin that we voted on.

Explain to me why that would be bad. Like, I know a lot of you have no problem with Paul. I know a lot of you have no problem with the way things are now. But I don't understand the downside that you all seem to think there is? Someone explain this to me.