Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160220165807/@comment-27719755-20160221012309

I think if everyone throws out their random ass votes for people to be voted up, that it will definitely be a failure. I mean come on, no one who just joined this site(myself included) have a single idea of who could actually do a good job and who actually has a long lasting interest and a good track record. We can't vote for people just because someone thinks that they are cool, has a good theory, or will go up against the "EVIL TYRANT" that some of you claim.

This is my opinion on what should be done if you want Paul, or anyone for that matter to take this seriously. Close this stupid topic that is sure to be pointless as half the people being voted for have already said they don't want it, or haven't been members very long. Half these people being voted for have never spoken a word about how they would do their job on here. We need to start a new topic with a week time table, where people who are interested in being voted for have to write up the reasons why we should vote for them and why they would do a good job. Then, after a week of this, people can place their votes for whom they would like to see raised to the position of admin. After a 2 week voting period, where only people who were members of this community prior to the start of the voting thread being opened can vote. After the voting period we have our winner.

Also, real quick question. Why are we voting for 2 people? I am not sure we have 2 people who could actually do a great job at the proposed position. I say we hold off on stating a number of people to be voted for until we see who is interested in the job and see what they believe they can do to make this community a great place and improve all aspects of the community.

Just my two cents