Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4091815-20160221025102/@comment-27719755-20160223174722

The fact of the matter is that there were like 2 extra votes for a yes then a no. And out of the yes and no votes, like 3-4 have not posted on these message boards another time other then to vote. I would agree with Paul's statement that it os not the will of the community. If there would of been an overwhelming ratio towards the yes side, even though I voted no I could totally see people complaining, but not when it was that close and not when both sides had seemingly fake accounts voting.

also, how in the world can it even be thought that an open ended voting for whomever people think would do a good job would be a good idea? The people who don't like Paul would simply vote for someone who would try to sabotage Paul every step of the way, while very few would actually vote, or have a good basis for that matter, for people who were qualified to do a good job on here. it's not like Paul simply put in his friends into positions and gave people no explanation on why. He stated why he thought they would be good fits and anyone who disagrees with what he wrote about each individual clearly has not paid attention to this community. Every person is active, and has been great memvers of this community.

Long live the million dollar assistant, Virgil!!