Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-37.24.148.3-20130801173359/@comment-175.35.14.75-20130803024054

Jestermonkey4u wrote: BoricuaWolf andCharmedcraze Thank you! I agree with most of what you've said and it has been a relief to finally be able to place things in a more proper order given all you've said. I think I kept getting hung up on the date due to Peter's youthful look in the flashback episode. Now I think I have a better sense of the timeline. BoricuaWolf's argument certainly makes sense. Defnitely agree with his/her points that:

a) Gerard may have been lying when he told Chris that Deuc killed Alex Argent. He lies more than he tells the truth.

b) The clothes from the flashback scenes are definitely not from the 70's or 80's. They look very much like early 2000's fashion.

c) If Deuc had bitten/encountered Alex Argent he would've been more weary of meeting with Gerard.

Just one question though: Why did they show us Alex Argent (including his identity etc.) in Motel California if it doesn't have a connection to the greater plot?