Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-25530642-20150804204255/@comment-25176701-20150805002811

Anyone can be saved, but only if they want to be saved. I'll start by using the Twins and Peter as examples.

The Twins were bad guys, obviously not as bad as Peter, but they weren't even close to being good people. Deucalion, while a psychopath, encouraged them to be violent and convinced them that killing is okay. Once the Twins were around their lovers (Lydia and Danny) and the rest of the pack, they began to realize that what they did to people was wrong, they began to realize that they didn't want to be monsters anymore, and that they wanted to change for the better. With the help of Scott's pack, even though they weren't officially in it, they began to change. They finally found a GOOD reason to fight and die for: To protect people, what Scott's pack always does. They were savable because they wanted to be saved.

Now, onto Peter. Peter's a complete sociopath and he could be savable, too, but he needs to want to be savable before that's possible. The problem with Peter is that he doesn't care. He doesn't care about who he hurts and he doesn't care about the lives, some that were innocent, he took. At the end of the day, all he cares about is if he gets what he wants. He doesn't think he needs to be saved because he doesn't believe what he's doing is wrong. He thinks he's justified in his actions. If he could see the wrong in what he's done, then he would want to change. But since he can't see the wrong, he doesn't want to be saved.

In the end, it's all up to Theo. It will be HIS choice and his choice only if he ends up being savable. The question that determines that is: Will Theo understand the wrong in his actions and want to change for the better? Right now, to me at least, he seems too much like Peter to be bothered to care about what he did to people.

"You can't save somebody who doesn't want to be saved."