Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4091815-20160202180218/@comment-5379216-20160202224443

HolyDrumstick wrote:.

Listing it as canon (even now) breaks his own rules as to how to identify canon. It was based on an assumption. Paul constantly changes his rules as to how to identify canon. I've been here for years and I've seen it happen many times. He'll change his rules in a matter of seconds so that he can continue to identify his theories/assumptions as canon. It's annoying and I would even say childish.