Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160220165807/@comment-27547895-20160221024752

Biz2424 wrote: HolyDrumstick wrote:

Utah Alpha wrote: No, it's not. They were clear about it. I'm just saying, you shouldn't be so quick to rush forward. They are still reviewing and investigating the topic for one, but, the lady was clear, the vote had to pass with a 75% yes to no ratio in order for it to pass. I am sure once it's done, either they will, or Paul will pass down a message and if it says it passed and to vote for 2 more admins, I'll be the first to vote, but, as Of right now, we still aren't there yet. Each to their own. I never held any belief that Paul would uphold the vote 75% or more, anyway. He doesn't have to. And that's what I'm saying, the only time Paul is forced to do anything is when there is a 75% in favor of demoting. So, Wikia does not care about THIS vote, because he doesn't have to enforce it anyway.

Still, I have every right to keep on keeping on, with this, until wikia support comes in and tells me to let it go. They haven't done that either.

So, that's what I'll do. Considering you always point out the times that Paul is caught lying on here, I feel like I should point something out. You have stated many times that you thought Paul overall did a good job as an admin and that you did not want to see him demoted. However, when reading the original post in the voting thread(link can be found in the original post Holy wrote) you stated that you would only put a vote in to demote Paul if he did not respect the vote if it did come out as being a yes. However, right here you clearly state that you never once thought that Paul would honor the vote. Now, with all due respect, based on what you clearly wrote it has kind of been your intent to get rid of Paul this entire time. Whether you did things the politically correct way or took AlphaKillers approach, it does seem that your intent this entire time is to get rid of Paul. I just feel like I should point this out as many people have accused you of wanting to get rid of Paul and of having it out for him, and the entire time you have stated that you just want this site to be the best it can be. But you and I both know that if Paul leaves this site, by the end of Season 6 it will be just as dead and late to be updated and lack any of the inside scoops that we often get. You did not even give Paul a chance to say he wasn't honoring the vote before accusing him of doing so. You also set up the vote for a new admin to fail by opening it up for anyone to vote for anyone when we both know there is maybe 3-4 people who could do a great job. Actually, all I ever said was that wikia told me to have this vote first, and then have a vote to demote Paul if it didn't work out.

And I put the option to vote to demote on the first thread.

However, I never voted to demote, as I have always said I wouldn't start the vote to demote.

If you really thought I was lying about that you could have just waited until I started said vote to demote (which would never happen). As it stands, this is simply more slander.

ALSO, anyone can go back and double check that to see that it is so. If you don't know how to view posts prior to edits, I'll walk you through it, so you can all see I never changed my stance on that.

Cheers.