Thread:ATeenWolfFan/@comment-5379216-20160206011422/@comment-27547895-20160206013432

ATeenWolfFan wrote: Like what? It all comes down to how well you pay attention to the show and what your opinion is on the definition of "canon" I know this is long, I am sorry, but please read.

The issue is that what canon is should not be decided by one person's definition of canon. Thus far, what is considered canon has been up to Paul.rea. He does not accept any opposing thoughts. He states rules for what he considers canon, but does not follow them.

It is never stated anywhere on the show that werecoyotes can all full shift. Malia did so once by instinct as a child, but has been unable to do so again. She is also a Hale, and Hales have a trend of being able to full shift. Not that it is canon that it is hereditary, but it is possible. Theo is chimera, and knows many things from the dread doctors, so we cannot assume that his only reason for being able to full shift is due to his werecoyote half.

Technically, the commissioned bestiary claims that werecoyotes have the innate ability, but Paul does not consider the beastiary as canon....supposedly. Yet, here he seems to, because it agrees with him.

It is also never stated that Malia and Theo are more comfortable with each other due to being werecoyote. That is another assumption. Theo is just as much werewolf, as we forget, so why are the others not more comfortable with him for that very same reason?

Yet, this is what is stated in canon.

There's also the French code on the #312 page, which Paul refuses to change for accuracy. When arguing about it, Paul basically accused Alphawerewolf5 of not mentioning the proper French when the argument first originated. However, if you view Alphawerewolf5's wall, you find that he spoke directly with Paul about it, back then, and Paul simply ignored him. This pretty much proves what we've been saying since this all started.

Paul also stated Lydia and banshees as being nonsupernatural as canon in forums and on the pages. Sure, Jeff Davis finally emailed about it, but before that there was only one piece of evidence supporting that. It was a theory. In, now, Paul refuses to apply the same evidence to Hellhounds. Which goes to show that his theory on banshees was not actually canon in the first place. Why? His opinion.

Paul does not care what other's opinions are. You can either agree with what he says, and he'll let you post on HIS pages, or you don't and he'll shut you down.