Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-26601629-20150805064853/@comment-26601629-20150810013953

Jestermonkey4u wrote: How do I know the Kitsune has no motive? Because we haven't seen one, that's how. We have seen a motive for Theo however.

When did the Kitsune try "murdering" Noshiko? Kiras' mom attacked her first so the battle and the Kitsune trying to kill her in that scene is purely self defense. The same for Lucas. He was a threat, the enemy, not someone just innocently attacked.

The problem is your Kitsune theory requires inventive motive or speculation whereas Theo has established motive. Of the two, the Kitsune requires embellishment and the other requires zero additional thought. Umm....... I'll call attacking a kid that is already out cold trying to murder the person, how is that self defence. And are you really going on about Nojiko's scene, seriously, she was holding an actual katana, no the toned down version belt( those things are used to disembowel and decapitate people), and nojiko already lost her weapon and was cowering, how is trying to attack someone like that with a katana self defence, especially when said someone is your mom.

And your theory on theo doing it when he didnt have the means, how is that any different from accepeting that the kitsune might have done it.

Theo has motive, but never had the opportunity but you are willing to believe him doing it is okay, but throwing out the possibility of the kitsune (who had opportunity and means) doing it based on no motive. Both of them are based of the same "inventiveness" you  mentioned, aren't you inventing the posibility of theo doing it, when it was shown he had no opportunity.