Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-27547895-20160205175104

Godechaud wrote: I just had to laugh really hard... Thank you for that.

I followed the link you postsd and looked at the stets you suggested me to check.

So let's discuss the numbers shall we? Especiallysince you used them as a proof for your opinion.

The teen Wolf wikia has a wam score of 96.05 (out of 100). The lowest wikia has a score 0.2***.

I looked at the numbers wikis. 5000.

TW wikia's current ranking is ....... 39

Let's do the math.... This wiki is under the top 0.78%.

Now in my eye that's a pretty awesome ranking.

Conclusion, you didn't start saving shit. Your making a mess and a fool out of yourself.oh and BTW don't forget that tw (the TV show) ratings dropped year after. I'm sorry that you fail to interpret the numbers correctly.

The number of visits to this site ARE quite high. I'm not denying that. However, this is actually due to the success of Teen Wolf as a show and the success of Wikia.com. Of course, if people know about Wikia and are fans of the show, they will VISIT this wikia, which is at the top when you search.

If you base it off that, this wikia is basically getting credit for others' success. It is what it is.

So, COMPARE similarly ranked wikias. Compare the communities. You'll see this wikia's community is quite small.

In fact, by Paul's own admission, there have been 3-4 mil visitors throughout periods with only 20-ish members active. Compare those numbers. 3-4mil vs 20. That in itself is evidence of a struggling community.

THIS is exactly why I told you to go look at comparable wikias.