Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20140731064438/@comment-11533671-20140801024736

LadyX wrote: Jestermonkey4u wrote: ^ As always though, none of this means that TW follows these definitions. That's what I get for being an older D&D nerd I guess!

Based on the options given, I feel like Deaton's more true neutral, than the Neutral Good that it seems he wants us to think. But I think he would take action. But...only if he couldn't manipulate someone else to do it for him.

Exactly. He will extend knowledge - if asked for advice; will help with "ghostbusting" (ash, etc.) supplies, medical help (and for Scott a steady flow of cash - provided he worked for it ) - but not in-the-field of battle; will cheer on the good guys and only 'volunteer' information if doing so keeps the piece. Oh and as a bonus for Scott! A steady flow of dirt bike gas cash - provided he worked for it. Lol.