Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-25184427-20140718202358

Paul.rea wrote: HolyDrumstickofLove wrote: Paul.rea wrote: You keep writing novels that come down to "Scott should" blah blah blah - your standards are your own and have nothing to do with the actual show. Do me a favor, go through this entire thread and quote all the places where we said "Scott should." Sure, you'll find a few...but just a few.

Your arguement is paper thin, and you keep running us in circles....though, I myself have actually cited an episode that highlighted and explained Scott's weakness.

You are one of those people that cannot admit when you have lost a debate. It is annoying as hell. To say that Scott is weak is to say that he "should" be doing something differently.

He did not want to become a monster in that scene with the twins - it was the heart of the scene. To say that his choice not to become a monster makes him weak...

We aslo don't have a definition of weak/strong since Scott's actions are equal to those of other Alphas we've seen.

I've not lost anything since the terms in this "discussion" are defined only by your idea of what Scott SHOULD be and not on how other Alphas before him performed. You're so full of crap I doubt you even believe what you're saying.