Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-6383956-20160208165131

A) We have a whole team of admin to make sure whatever edits there are stay accurate. We're actually talking about adding one or two, so I fail to see the problem.

B) Most of the current and new pages are locked and can only be edited by admin, which is the policy of this Wiki in order to keep it accurate. Nobody's suggesting that that change.

C) We're pretty much just talking about activity on the forums (except for the fact that there are places where things that aren't canon and are just Paul's headcanon are in the articles but that has less to do with the topic of activity). And despite what Paul keeps saying -- I don't think people are looking things up on the forum labeled "False Info and Speculative Discussion" which then proceeds to claim that we're mostly just making things up.

So, again, what's the down side to adding a community selected admin?