Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-4753851-20140203213334/@comment-13965604-20140204035612

Bigwolfonbase wrote: LadyX wrote:

Bigwolfonbase wrote: Its weird because i honestly feel the concept of "Pack" in this show is over-hyped and under used. So far we've seen no actual value in having a pack except for streangth in numbers. Which seeing as how they team up so easily anyway really doesnt even need to be a pack thing. It's a very underdeveloped concept in the show. Derek says you need at least three betas to be a proper Pack, but Peter sure didn't seem to be too worried about it in S1, and Scott doesn't seem too driven to get more betas himself now. Now, Scott might be a bit special in that he was surviving as an omega because of his "human Pack" and his "human Pack" members might be translating to his Wolf as betas.

I don't understand why people seem to believe that there should be some drive to want to develop a pack. Peter just needed enough streangth to take out the people burned him and he was doing pretty good on his own. Honestly just think peter wanted an underling cause he seems like the type. Derek wanted one, regardless of what we think about his choices, to actually gain power due to an impending threat. Scott really has no reason to want a Pack and as far as we know there has never been shown to be an urg for an Alpha to form one.

I really wish I had the words to explain the thought process behind it, but I don't. It could simply be mass head canon that we've developed based on Derek saying you need three to have a pack, and common sense saying an alpha would want a pack. Plus there's this whole omega thing that nobody wants to be because they're weak, and there must be a way for an Alpha to lose his status without dying because Derek mentioned it when he talked about his Triskele in S1. I feel like a bit of a baby crying for mommy saying this, but I really hope DmanCO comes and can explain it better than I can.