Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-16083651-20170111164432/@comment-25222572-20170121062046

Killer kev wrote: @AOA, I'm counting on Theo doing some evil shit again. It's either that or a redemption arc, which I'm completely against. No need to fix a sociopath. I'd rather Peter go through a redemption arc (also against this but it's more believable) than Theo. Peter was a psychopath at best, and he clearly cares for Malia, which is more than can be said about Theo. Peter had his chance at being the big bad, twice, I'm definitely past that. Oh, absolutely. Theo should NEVER be redeemed. Especially not since Peter appears to be on something of a vaguely redemptive path. We do NOT need both of our mult-season manipulative bad guys going soft on us. And Peter is preferable anyway, since (even from S1) you can make a case for why he does the things he does, and why he is the way he is. And you can even see that he clearly cares for his family, in his own way (even if, up until now, he's cared more for himself than for them). And hell, what they're doing now, having him care for Malia, sacrifice for her, putting her well-being above him....that's not totally unbelievable. You could see how he'd get to that point, even if his past actions show him placing himself above anyone, even those he loves.

Theo? He cares for nothing and noone, but himself and his own self-aggrandizement. His own power. When he was a young boy, he gladly went along with a plan to murder his own SISTER, and rip out her fucking heart, just so he could feel powerful. And he didn't suffer one shred of remorse for that. He's been bad since the start, and nothing should change that. \

^Lol. Nervous, you're always good for a laugh. But considering the fact that both Marrish and Stalia have disappeared into the aether, then I think our dear Mr Mxzylptlk will be fine. ;)