Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-4802762-20160211210803

I've already stated that I found you word choice and tone in the majority of your posts to come off as childish and somewhat antagonistic. Maybe it's the psychology major in me but your comments (calling him a clever bully and a tyrant for example) are coming off as very antagonistic.

However, since this is ultimately about the fate of the wiki, I suppose it is best to set the rest aside. I already gave a counter argument as to why a community appointed admin may not be the best idea. If you'd just scroll up a little bit, you can read it there.

I personally see very little wrong with the way this wiki is being run. My only real issue is the lack of a comment section on the pages. However, since you all clearly do see a problem, I propose that instead of having the entire community make the final decision, instead they simply nominate a few users and the administration team and some of the more trusted users (users that don't throw hissy fits when things go their way) come together and narrow it down/vote. Instead of leaving the entire decision up to the entire community.