Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160220165807/@comment-27547895-20160221042241

Biz2424 wrote:You will claim he is trying to put his "yes men" in position, when you are really mad that you can't put a "No to Paul" man in position. Disregarding everything else you've said, because it is outright false and slander.

However THIS is actually correct. My goal from the start has been to check and balance Paul. You can't check him if you don't have someone who opposes him. However, that person would also not be able to demote Paul. So, no. I don't want Paul gone. You can believe that all you want, but many things on this site would flat out suck if he was gone.

However, the community already sucks (in comparison to what it SHOULD be based on site hits), BECAUSE of Paul.rea.

And YES. The plan has always been to find someone to oppose him, in order to prevent any more harm.

But, it was never to kick him to the curb. Despite what you seem to think.