Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4723271-20140716053249/@comment-4091815-20141225011128

"Teen Wolf shouldn't have been singled out at all"

"the GLAAD report doesn't do a good job of telling us the quality of characters, since they way they measure quality is based on something more objective than what most of us mean when we discuss it. (Diversty, being their standard, while most of the rest of us talk about well-roundedness.)"

"In general, when people talk about whether or not a character is quality, they're not talking about whether or not that person is from an ethnic minority or where they sit on the gender spectrum"

These are examples of what you've been saying - my comprehension suggests you -

A. Don't agree with the objective assessment. 2. Think you speak for "most of the rest" of the folk concerned about these issues.