User blog comment:Stuartfergie/Changing the current policy of deleting and editing comments/@comment-11016607-20130706163040/@comment-11514922-20130706221825

The comment section is for speculation, as long as it is based on the facts of the show. Like who you think the killer is, or who would win in a fight, possible reasons for scotts eyes going red and such. The articles are fine, and need to be factual. The comment section is designed for people to add their opinion, which includes speculation. If a person say "I think.." or "I would like.." you know its an opinion and not fact. Thats one of the things taught in basic English class at school.

Agreed, it wasnt a spoiler and should have stayed. My whole point is one person, who is using their person opinions, should be able to make the sole decision on what can be contributed. The point of a wiki is that anyone can contribute. And Paul is sort of infringing on it. Some people like everything taken care of, some people dislike the lack of freedom. Depends on the person. But everyone is entitled to their opinion and one persons opinion is worth equal to to another, not more or less.

I put in the suggestion for the comment section, he said he wasnt going to acknowledge my opinion until I made an account. So I made one, and he still didnt value or even take in my opinion. And calls anyone who objects part of the minority, and that we are no big deal (Look at my talk page).

Im not saying that Im ungrateful for the work he has put in, he does a good job. But is mishandling the community and is running it as his personal site, banning people who object.

He does a good job but he is almost bordering on the abuse of power.