Board Thread:WARNING ALL USERS False Info\Spoilers/@comment-209.141.131.212-20130709011039/@comment-11533671-20130806144638

Paul.rea

Hmm...let me see....did I say "only worn in the 90s"? Nope. I said that the fashion choices of all three individuals are definable by the era. Did I say that the time line was “obvious”? Again, no I did not. You seem to infer things that are not implacably stated. I have another example of you doing this with the Q&A sessions. I’ll point it out….please continue reading. One quick note: Although it doesn’t change his answer one bit you should be aware that earlier answers are subject to change when new answers are given. If I said I’ll be somewhere at 4 and then later I said 5 my last answer is the current one I will use unless I replace that answer with a newer one. I prefer to go with what is “currently” the answer Jeff gives.

I like reading the Q&A’s he gives to multiple sites. What is most interesting is how you misinterpret the answers. Milford, CT and New Haven, CT are a little over 8.8 or by car 11.7 miles apart from one another, or 18 minutes by car. So when Jeff says it is like 5 minutes away he is simply stating that it doesn’t take long to reach the bigger cities from his small town. I know exactly what he is talking about since I to come from a small town with easy and quick access to a larger town nearby. This is NOT a suburb as you call it. Do you know what a suburb is? Must we enlighten you? Apparently we must. Here is the Merriam-Webster definition for you:

Definition of SUBURB 

1a : an outlying part of a city or town

b  : a smaller community adjacent to or within commuting distance of a city

c  plural : the residential area on the outskirts of a city or large town

2

plural  : the near vicinity

You are confusing a suburb with a borough. They are completely different. A borough has its own form of government that is different than the city it is part of, although it is an incorporated part of the larger city. The Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, etc. are all boroughs of New York City, NY. They are NOT suburbs. A suburb is nothing more than the neighborhood of a city that is usually further away from the congestion of the downtown businesses and major shopping areas. It may contain a convenience store, farmland, wooded areas as well as gated communities or other residential places that are all governed by the city’s council.

Jeff is simply saying that he envisioned Beacon Hills to be like his hometown. He compares it to his hometown. This means exactly what he says. Beacon Hills is a small town in which he can travel to New Haven, a nearby larger city that has skyscrapers and is densely packed. New Haven is not controlled or governed by Milford, they are separate cities. Beacon Hills is a small town as he states, it has suburbs that have been incorporated but this is mainly residential, wooded, agricultural land or something similar. You misinterpreted his meaning based on not knowing the differences between a suburb and a borough. This was one of his earliest answers about Beacon Hills. His newest answer explicitly states that Beacon Hills is a small town. I’m going to go with Jeff on this and ignore your interpretation.

Plaid shirts…yeah they are worn today, both Scott and Stiles have worn plaid shirts throughout the show…but hang on, did you do it again? Yep, you did. Scott and Stiles are wearing the SAME fashion. I gave three different fashion selections by three different people that are different from one another but all existed in the same time era. In other words they weren’t all wearing a high top fade, they didn’t all have plaid on, and they weren’t all wearing waist cut jeans with boots. So, three people decided to wear entirely different articles of fashion that were made definable in the same decade. It just seems like too much of a coincidence to me. Furthermore, I’ve stated that I could be wrong about things, but as for this? I’ve never hinged my theory on this alone. So really, your point has no validation since YOU don’t know when it happened either.

Bottom line is that I developed a theory based on the show. I’ve done this literally with almost any show I’ve taken interest in. Hell, I watched LOST for 6 freaking seasons and despite Damon Lindelof and his partner telling us that it wasn’t purgatory (since season 1 fan’s speculated this) it turns out that it really was a form of it. Ok, I know there was more to it but essentially nothing else really matters beyond that ending. As for Teen Wolf? Answers will be given eventually and as I’ve admitted, those answers may discredit any and all of my theory. That is fine. YOU however get on here and instead of giving us your own theory in which we can scrutinize and pick apart, debate and/or tear apart, or in lieu of enlightening anyone with your “take” on things, you’d rather act like most douche bags and insult the people posting. You don’t answer the questions posed back that you claim “could be true”, but ignore it and continue ranting. I am surprised that a “writer” such as you has so much trouble with words and need clarification as to their definition. I copy/paste so that I am not accused of plagiarism. Between the two of us? I have more integrity.