Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-27547895-20160201202203/@comment-5237598-20160208164639

Grahamburglar wrote: Godechaud -- the difference, you're only looking at the traffic to this Wiki. No one is disagreeing that this Wiki has a high amount of traffic. The argument HolyDrumstick is making is that with those numbers, we should have a higher number of people posting on the forums. HolyDrumstick is saying, look at the Wikis with comparable traffic numbers and see how active and large their communities are. If you have a counterargument to that, I'm sure we're all ears.

Alphakiller.... you're not helping. We're not getting rid of Paul. The end. The reason Paul thinks he owns this Wiki is because he does own this Wiki. As in, it's his. It belongs to him. He is the owner. I'm not sure how to make it clearer, we're not discussing getting rid of Paul. Period. I understand what Drumsticks means... I am not saying that the activity is high. Read my post again please. I'm saying that to me, the traffic has more relevance. And there lies the issue. One side under Drumsticks lead believes that People should get more involved (eventhough i still believe that the actual reason is to gain more control...). The hypothesis is: if we give more control to "the People", they'll get more involved and the activity on this site will increase. The other side says (which includes me), this is an encyclopedia, a source of Information. It should be accurate for People who come here to look things up. The more People involved in the editing, the writing etc... the messier the Website becomes. That's why I say, no high activity needed. The only Thing relevant is, are People still coming on this wiki? The answer is yes.