Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-24732895-20140910035928/@comment-4091815-20140922005036

I am curious how you thought it was Anne's post to which I was responding.

Anne's post wasn't visible on the "Wiki Activity" page - because it was 4 up. So the anon post and my response to it would be the only thing visible on that page.

You could have been reading the posts in order on the thread but there again you would have seen the posts between Anne's and where you jumped in to contradict mine. So how you could have been mistaken? It's just not logical really. Your excuse doesn't track.

What makes far more sense is that you, caught in an argument that you couldn't dominate with your claims of "fiction theory supremacy," tried to get in one more dig before tucking your literary tail between your legs and slinking off in a huff. You attempted to cast me as the villain and falsely accused me of running off a new user.

You entered this thread after seeing my response to the anonymous post because that was all that was visible to anyone not already on this thread. Your claim that you were helping Anne is not true - you are a liar.