Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-4091815-20160202180218/@comment-7603754-20160202202010

HolyDrumstick wrote: Well, there you go.

As I said, previously, several times before, I wasn't really invested in whether she was or was not. Don't care either way.

I do care that you posted things as canon without knowing for sure. Because that's not canon.

But, now you can. :)

Doesn't mean it was canon before, though.

Cheers. Actually, it does mean that is was canon before, they just weren't nearly clear enough about it.