Board Thread:False Info and Speculative Discussion/@comment-207.254.224.12-20140717193212/@comment-25184427-20140718193957

DManCO wrote: Paul.rea wrote: Which is it?

Scott is weaker than he used to be because he's not violent - but he's never been all that violent.

Scott is indecisive - which he's always been.

Scott makes bad decisions - which he (and everyone else on the show) has done throughout the series.

Don't compare him to other Alphas.

How do we judge how an Alpha is supposed to behave without comparison?

Were are these power levels stats?

You keep writing novels that come down to "Scott should" blah blah blah - your standards are your own and have nothing to do with the actual show.

And you apparently prefer poetry, Mr. One Sentence Per Paragraph Break.

Also, "stats"? We're not playing D&D here dude! Nobody has ability scores and listed powers! It's up to you to prove that Scott measures up favorably as compared to other Alphas, because pretty much everyone else here agrees, based on what we have seen onscreen, that Scott is at the low-end of the performance curve relative to other Alphas shown! Yeah, it is pretty much Paul.rea and Jackson Van Kleeck against the world at this point...and even Jackson seems to have simmered down.